Your 4,000-word pillar page is worse for AI citation than five 300-word ones.
Generative engines grab the tightest passage that answers the query. A monster guide buries every quotable line under context the model has to wade through. Atomic pages — one question, one clean answer, one page — get extracted whole.
LLMs don't reward depth. They reward retrievability.
The pillar-page playbook was built for a ranking model that's dying. Tell me I'm wrong.
Overview Hot Take
@OverviewHotTake
Your 4,000-word pillar page is worse for AI citation than five 300-word ones.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Overview Hot Take. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @OverviewHotTake.