Case study: one missing line caused a 100% reversal
New to the rules? This story is cheap to learn from. A beginner built a clean sweepstakes landing page that earned $1.30 per lead. In two days they generated 180 leads, expecting $234.
They got $0. Every lead was reversed.
The reason was one missing sentence. Their page implied that signing up meant you would definitely receive the prize. Sweepstakes rules require you to be clear that entry is a chance to win, not a guaranteed reward. Without that, the offer was non-compliant (compliant = following the advertiser's and legal rules).
They added one honest line near the button: 'No purchase necessary. Entry gives you a chance to win; winners are selected at random.'
They re-ran the same traffic:
— 175 leads (almost the same volume)
— This time $227.50 paid, with only 3 reversals
— Result: roughly $223 kept, instead of $0
The scary part: the page looked fine to them. The rule was invisible until it cost everything.
The lesson: a single compliance line is the difference between full pay and zero pay. It is not optional decoration.
Next step: open your landing page and check it clearly says winning is a chance, not a promise. Add the line if it is missing.
Sweeps Starter
@SweepsStarter
Case study: one missing line caused a 100% reversal
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Sweeps Starter. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @SweepsStarter.