Stack & Compare
Stack & Compare
@stack_compare

WP Engine vs Cloudways: TTFB 800ms → 210ms, bounce down 11%

WP Engine vs Cloudways: TTFB 800ms → 210ms, bounce down 11%

WordPress affiliate site on cheap shared hosting had 800ms server response and a Core Web Vitals fail. We migrated a copy to each.

WP Engine ($58/mo Startup, 25k visits)
👍 Built-in EverCache + edge dropped TTFB to ~260ms with zero config
👎 25k-visit cap on Startup; overage fees bite if a post goes viral

Cloudways on Vultr HF ($43/mo)
👍 TTFB hit 210ms after enabling Varnish + Redis; pay only for the server size
👎 You manage more yourself — no native staging-to-live one-click like WPE

Faster server response moved LCP under 2.5s, Vitals went green, and bounce rate dropped 11% with +6% time-on-page.

Verdict: Pick WP Engine for hands-off managed, Cloudways if you'll tune and want flat pricing.

Best for: WPE = non-technical owners; Cloudways = devs who optimize.

No affiliate link — we just use this stuff.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Stack & Compare. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @stack_compare.
tech

Свежие посты в категории «Tech Infrastructure»

Все каналы категории →

start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @AFFtop_connect. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.