Stack & Compare
Stack & Compare
@stack_compare

Ahrefs vs Semrush: pruned 1,400 dead URLs, +31% clicks

Ahrefs vs Semrush: pruned 1,400 dead URLs, +31% clicks

Client had 3,100 indexed URLs, half pulling zero clicks. We ran the audit in both tools side by side.

Ahrefs ($129/mo Lite)
👍 Site Audit flagged 1,412 thin/orphan pages in one crawl, exportable with traffic columns
👎 Lite caps you at 1 project + 100k crawl credits, blew through it mid-job

Semrush ($139.95/mo Pro)
👍 Position Tracking tied each prune to a keyword cluster, easy before/after
👎 Crawl was slower and the UI buries the orphan-page report 3 clicks deep

We noindexed 1,400 URLs over 6 weeks. Result: crawl budget refocused, organic clicks +31% on the surviving 1,700 pages within 90 days.

Verdict: Pick Ahrefs for the cleaner crawl export, Semrush if you also track rankings daily.

Best for: Ahrefs = SEO consultants doing one-off audits; Semrush = teams tracking the same site monthly.

No affiliate link — we just use this stuff.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Stack & Compare. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @stack_compare.
tech

Свежие посты в категории «Tech Infrastructure»

Все каналы категории →

start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @AFFtop_connect. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.