WP Engine vs Cloudways: TTFB 800ms → 210ms, bounce down 11%
WordPress affiliate site on cheap shared hosting had 800ms server response and a Core Web Vitals fail. We migrated a copy to each.
WP Engine ($58/mo Startup, 25k visits)
👍 Built-in EverCache + edge dropped TTFB to ~260ms with zero config
👎 25k-visit cap on Startup; overage fees bite if a post goes viral
Cloudways on Vultr HF ($43/mo)
👍 TTFB hit 210ms after enabling Varnish + Redis; pay only for the server size
👎 You manage more yourself — no native staging-to-live one-click like WPE
Faster server response moved LCP under 2.5s, Vitals went green, and bounce rate dropped 11% with +6% time-on-page.
Verdict: Pick WP Engine for hands-off managed, Cloudways if you'll tune and want flat pricing.
Best for: WPE = non-technical owners; Cloudways = devs who optimize.
No affiliate link — we just use this stuff.
Stack & Compare
@stack_compare
WP Engine vs Cloudways: TTFB 800ms → 210ms, bounce down 11%
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Stack & Compare. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @stack_compare.