I won more auctions by bidding less. The counterintuitive part.
The setup. Programmatic display, RTB, mid-tier mobile inventory. I was bidding aggressively to "secure volume." Illustrative numbers.
The move. Logic said higher bids = more wins = more scale. I pushed my bid 40% above the suggested floor to dominate.
The numbers. Higher bid won me more impressions — but disproportionately the impressions OTHER buyers passed on, the low-quality inventory nobody else wanted at any price. My win rate rose, my CR fell. At the aggressive bid: 2.1M imps, 0.88 ROI. I dropped the bid to just above floor: 1.3M imps but on inventory I was now winning on merit, CR rose, 1.34 ROI. Fewer, better impressions.
The lesson. In auctions, winning too easily is a warning sign. If you're the top bid on an impression, ask why everyone else declined it. Overbidding adverse-selects you into the garbage inventory — you win exactly the auctions you should've lost.
What I'd do differently. Bid to win the RIGHT impressions, not the most. I now start near the floor and raise only on placements that prove out, treating a suspiciously high win rate as a quality alarm, not a victory.
Arb Files
@ArbFiles