<b>No-code rarely saves money. It moves the cost from build to forever.</b>

<b>No-code rarely saves money. It moves the cost from build to forever.</b>

The pitch is "no developers needed." The reality is monthly platform fees, premium plan jumps to unlock basics like more CMS items, paid plugins for forms and search, and a specialist who actually knows the builder's quirks and bills like a developer anyway. A custom static site can cost more up front and then run on near-zero hosting for years. No-code trades a one-time bill for a subscription you can never cancel without a rebuild.

Run the 3-year math, not the launch-week math. Agree? Or am I wrong?