Smartlink Routing vs Direct Broker Links: Which for Forex?
What it is: Two ways to monetize forex traffic. A smartlink (Affsub, RedTrack, or a network's own router) auto-distributes clicks to the best-converting broker per geo/device. A direct link sends everyone to one broker offer.
Best for smartlink: Mixed-geo traffic spanning tier-1 and tier-3, where no single broker accepts all countries and minimum deposits vary wildly.
Pros (smartlink)
— Catches geos a single broker rejects (avoids dead clicks on tier-3)
— Auto-rotates when one offer caps or pauses payouts
— One link to manage across 8-10 broker offers
Cons (smartlink)
— You lose per-broker creative matching; generic prelanders convert worse
— FTD quality drops; networks optimize for clicks, not deposit retention
— Postback attribution gets murky across hops
Direct links win when you have one strong geo (say DE or AU), a broker that pays $400+ CPA there, and creatives tuned to that brand's funnel. The conversion lift from a matched prelander usually beats routing gains.
Who should skip smartlinks: Single-geo media buyers running one broker. The routing overhead adds latency and dilutes your FTD optimization without upside.
Verdict: Smartlinks for spread, direct for depth.
Spread Bench
@SpreadBench
Smartlink Routing vs Direct Broker Links: Which for Forex?
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Spread Bench. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @SpreadBench.