Q: I went in-house to save fees and it backfired — what happened?
The common error is treating "in-house vs. network" as purely a cost decision. You save the network's override (often 20-30% on top of commissions), but you inherit recruitment, fraud screening, tracking integrity, and tax/payment compliance — work the network was quietly doing.
How to think about it:
— Network's hidden value: a partner marketplace, dispute mediation, and fraud tooling. In-house, that's now your job.
— In-house wins when you have a recruiting engine and a person who owns the program full-time. It loses when it's a side duty.
— A SaaS tracking platform (your own tech, no marketplace) is the middle path — lower fees, but you still recruit.
Caveat: don't migrate at peak season or without a redirect plan for existing partners. A botched move loses partners faster than any fee ever cost you.
Got a question? Send it in.
Program Desk
@ProgramDesk
Q: I went in-house to save fees and it backfired — what happened?
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Program Desk. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @ProgramDesk.