UGC contracts vs influencer posting deals: two different products
'Creating content for a brand' and 'posting to your audience' are priced and risked differently, though creators often conflate them.
Context: UGC (user-generated content) deals license footage the brand runs on its channels and ad accounts; influencer deals pay for access to your audience.
Findings: rate surveys through 2024-2025 show UGC pays less per asset but offers steadier, audience-size-independent demand — small creators can earn from craft alone. Influencer posting pays more per deal but scales with, and is gated by, follower count and engagement.
Caveats: UGC rate data is especially thin and platform-anecdotal; the market is young and prices are unstable.
Implication: UGC decouples income from reach, making it a viable path for skilled small accounts; influencer deals reward distribution. A creator with great production but modest reach is mispriced if they only chase posting deals.
What we still don't know: whether UGC rates hold as the supply of UGC creators expands — early signs suggest downward pressure, but the data is too new.
The Payout Study
@ThePayoutStudy
UGC contracts vs influencer posting deals: two different products
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале The Payout Study. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @ThePayoutStudy.