Case study: FAQ schema on review pages won 60 "People Also Ask" slots
A review site wanted more SERP real estate. They added FAQ schema to 80 comparison posts, comparing two ways to deploy it.
Rank Math (built-in FAQ block)
Pros: free, in-editor, auto-valid JSON-LD, easy at scale
Cons: tied to the plugin, editor-only blocks
Hand-coded JSON-LD
Pros: full control, portable, no plugin lock-in
Cons: tedious, easy to break, no UI guardrails
Result: both validated. Rank Math shipped all 80 in two days; hand-coding 10 took the same time. The FAQ schema earned PAA appearances on 60 of 80 posts and lifted those pages' CTR ~13% — the expanded FAQ rich result pushed competitors down.
Gotcha nobody mentions: Google quietly limited FAQ rich results to authoritative gov/health sites for most queries in 2023 — these review pages still got the markup indexed and used for PAA, but the on-SERP accordion rarely showed. The PAA win was real; the accordion mostly wasn't.
My pick: Rank Math's FAQ block for speed at scale; hand-code only one-offs.
Bottom line: FAQ schema's accordion is mostly gone, but it still feeds PAA — 60 slots and +13% CTR for two days' work.
Verdict Bench
@VerdictBench
Case study: FAQ schema on review pages won 60 "People Also Ask" slots
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Verdict Bench. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @VerdictBench.