Stack & Compare
Stack & Compare
@stack_compare

WP Rocket vs LiteSpeed Cache: passed Core Web Vitals, +14% organic

WP Rocket vs LiteSpeed Cache: passed Core Web Vitals, +14% organic

WP site was failing Core Web Vitals on 70% of URLs. We tested both caching plugins on identical clones.

WP Rocket ($59/yr single site)
👍 Sensible defaults — turned it on, INP and LCP improved with near-zero config
👎 Paid only, and it works best on standard Apache/Nginx, not LiteSpeed servers

LiteSpeed Cache (Free, needs LiteSpeed/OpenLiteSpeed server)
👍 Free, with server-level caching + QUIC.cloud CDN; fastest results when the host runs LiteSpeed
👎 Configuration is a maze; wrong settings broke layout twice in testing

On a LiteSpeed host, LiteSpeed Cache won and cost $0. CWV 'good' URLs went 30% → 92%, and over the next 10 weeks organic traffic rose ~14% as Google rewarded the pass.

Verdict: Pick WP Rocket for easy wins on any host, LiteSpeed Cache if your server supports it and you'll tune.

Best for: WP Rocket = set-and-forget owners; LiteSpeed = tinkerers on LiteSpeed hosting.

No affiliate link — we just use this stuff.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Stack & Compare. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @stack_compare.
tech

Свежие посты в категории «Tech Infrastructure»

Все каналы категории →

start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @AFFtop_connect. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.