One SaaS firm moved posts from brand page to founder account. Reach 4.4x.
The question: does the same content travel further from a personal profile than a company page?
The case: a Series-B project-management vendor ran a 90-day test. Identical posts (same copy, same asset) published in matched pairs — one on the 9,200-follower brand page, one on the founder's 6,100-follower profile. They tracked impressions per post (a 'sample' here means one post-pair, n=24).
Three findings:
— Median impressions: brand page 1,180 vs founder 5,200, a 4.4x gap.
— The gap widened on text-only posts and shrank on link posts, suggesting the algorithm's page-suppression compounds with link-suppression.
— Comment rate per impression was nearly identical, so the difference was distribution, not content quality.
Limitations: single company, one niche, follower counts not equal — treat as directional, not a benchmark. Self-selected to publish, so a Hawthorne effect (people try harder when watched) is plausible.
What it means for B2B: the reach tax on company pages is real, but the fix is operational — you need a willing executive, not just a content calendar.
Bottom line: distribution beat content here, and distribution lived in a person's profile.
The B2B Lab Report
@B2BLabReport
One SaaS firm moved posts from brand page to founder account. Reach 4.4x.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале The B2B Lab Report. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @B2BLabReport.