Stitch Stack
Stitch Stack
@StitchStack

Myth: trust your tool's click analytics to measure Threads link performance

Schedulers proudly show in-app 'clicks' on your Threads links, and the advice is to optimize against them. The myth is that those numbers are reliable. Threads link previews and in-app browsers mangle referrer data, so tool-side click counts are often guesses.

Tested a scheduler's click stats against the destination site's own UTM analytics for 11 days.
— Tool reported clicks that the landing-page analytics never registered
— Gap ran 20-40% on link posts

The correction: tag links with UTM parameters and trust your own analytics, not the scheduler's click counter.

Annoying limitation: some tools auto-shorten links and strip your UTM tags unless you disable it in settings.

Verdict: tool-side click stats are Wait; your own UTM tracking is Worth it.
This post was published in the Telegram channel Stitch Stack. Subscribe here: @StitchStack.
ai_creative

Latest posts in “AI and creatives”

All channels in this category →

start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @AFFtop_connect. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.