Shorts Stack Tested
Shorts Stack Tested
@ShortsStackTested

Myth: using stock b-roll tanks your Shorts because it's 'unoriginal'

Myth: using stock b-roll tanks your Shorts because it's 'unoriginal'
People conflate reused YouTube clips (which DO get suppressed) with licensed stock. They're different. Licensed stock under your own narration and edit is original content.

B-roll sources tested
— Pexels/Pixabay: free, decent, everyone uses the same 20 clips
— Storyblocks: $30/mo, deeper library
— Runway AI b-roll: $12/mo, generates unique shots

Pros: AI-generated b-roll is genuinely unique, dodges the 'same clip' problem.
Cons: free stock is recognizable; AI b-roll still has artifacts.

Price: free works, Runway from $12/mo.
Best for: faceless channels needing visual variety.
Verdict: stock is fine if licensed and edited. For uniqueness, Runway beats free Pexels. Skip if you've got real footage.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Shorts Stack Tested. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @ShortsStackTested.
ai_creative

Свежие посты в категории «AI & Creative Production»

Все каналы категории →

start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @AFFtop_connect. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.