<b>An honest map of the extensions</b>

<b>An honest map of the extensions</b>

New operators waste money chasing shiny TLDs. A grouped reality check on resale liquidity:

<b>Liquid</b>
— .com — still 80%+ of real end-user demand
— .io, .ai — genuine tech/startup buyers (but .ai renewals sting)

<b>Niche-liquid</b>
— .co, .org for the right context; .net occasionally

<b>Mostly hold-bags</b>
— Most new gTLDs (.xyz, .online, etc.): cheap to reg, brutal to resell
— Buyers exist but the spread is thin and slow

None of these are "bad" — they're just different liquidity. Match your patience to the extension.

📌 Pick of the day: outside .com, only buy non-.com if you can name the exact buyer before you check out.