Stack & Compare
Stack & Compare
@stack_compare

Myth: Ahrefs search volume is the number you should plan content around

Myth: Ahrefs search volume is the number you should plan content around

"Target the 2,400/mo keyword" assumes Ahrefs volume equals real impressions. It doesn't — it's a clickstream-modeled estimate, and Google Search Console shows your actual impressions for the same query, often 3-5x off either way.

Ahrefs ($129/mo Lite)
👍 Finds keywords you don't rank for yet
👎 Volume is modeled, not measured; clusters near-duplicates as one number

GSC (free)
👍 Real impressions/clicks for queries you already touch
👎 Blind to anything you don't rank for; samples and hides long-tail

Use Ahrefs to discover, then validate the winners against GSC impressions before you commit a writer. Planning purely off Ahrefs volume is how you publish a "high-volume" page that pulls 40 impressions a month.

Best for: Ahrefs for net-new discovery; GSC for deciding what's actually worth refreshing.

No affiliate link — we just use this stuff.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Stack & Compare. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @stack_compare.
tech

Свежие посты в категории «Tech Infrastructure»

Все каналы категории →

start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @AFFtop_connect. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.