Open Measurement SDK vs proprietary viewability SDKs
IAB's OM SDK promised one integration for all verifiers. It mostly delivered, with caveats.
Open Measurement SDK
— ✓ One SDK, multiple verification vendors, no per-vendor bloat
— ✓ Publisher-friendly, lighter app footprint
— ✗ Vendor still controls signal interpretation, parity isn't guaranteed across measurers
Proprietary SDK (vendor-direct)
— ✓ Earliest access to that vendor's newest signals and beta metrics
— ✗ Each added vendor bloats the app and slows integration
For publishers, OM SDK is the clear default, one integration keeps your binary lean and buyers happy. Only go proprietary if a single demand partner contractually requires their own SDK or you need a metric OM hasn't standardized yet.
Verdict: OM SDK as default for app size and flexibility, proprietary only on contractual or bleeding-edge metric needs.
Best for: publishers managing SDK weight while satisfying verification demands.
In-App Bench
@InAppBench
Open Measurement SDK vs proprietary viewability SDKs
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале In-App Bench. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @InAppBench.