Reach Lab Reports
Reach Lab Reports
@ReachLabReports

Native Insights vs third-party analytics: where they diverge

Native Insights vs third-party analytics: where they diverge
n=70 accounts, reconciled over a 30-day window.
— Reach numbers: agreement within 2% (third-party pulls the same API)
— Best-time-to-post recommendations: agreed only 41% of the time
Third-party 'optimal time' tools lean on aggregate cross-account medians; native uses your followers' actual activity. On accounts under 5k, your own sample is too thin and the aggregate often wins.
So what: trust native for raw metrics. Treat third-party 'best time' as a starting hypothesis, not an answer — and only above ~5k followers where your own data has signal.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Reach Lab Reports. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @ReachLabReports.
traffic

Свежие посты в категории «Traffic Sources»

Все каналы категории →

start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @AFFtop_connect. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.