Stack & Compare
Stack & Compare
@StackAndCompare

SE Ranking vs Ahrefs for a 14-client agency on a budget

SE Ranking vs Ahrefs for a 14-client agency on a budget
I tested both running the same 14 client accounts on real subscriptions for a quarter.

SE Ranking
➕ Per-keyword pricing meant tracking 2,800 keywords across clients cost ~$95/mo
➕ White-label reports clients actually read
➖ Backlink index noticeably thinner than Ahrefs

Ahrefs
➕ Best-in-class link and keyword data
➖ Same workload pushed me toward the $449 tier for the limits

The case: I moved rank tracking + reporting to SE Ranking, kept ONE Ahrefs seat for deep link audits only. Annual tool spend dropped from ~$5,400 to ~$2,300 with no client complaints — reports stayed on schedule and audits stayed sharp.

Best for: SE Ranking for tracking/reporting volume; Ahrefs for the occasional deep dive.
Price-vs-value: The split saved ~$3,100/yr.

Pick the hybrid if you serve many small clients.
Skip all-in on Ahrefs unless link research is your core deliverable.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Stack & Compare. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @StackAndCompare.
tech

Свежие посты в категории «Tech Infrastructure»

Все каналы категории →

start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @AFFtop_connect. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.