Forex Deal Types Compared: CPA vs RevShare vs Hybrid
What it is: The three payout structures every broker affiliate program offers, and which tooling each demands.
Best for: Affiliates picking a deal before they have cohort data.
Pros (CPA):
— Cash now, risk on the broker — you're paid whether the trader survives or not
— Simple tracking; one event, one payout
Cons (CPA):
— Brokers cap it, scrub aggressively, and reserve the right to hold for quality
— You capture none of a whale's lifetime volume
Pros (RevShare):
— Uncapped upside on active traders; a few whales can dwarf months of CPA
— Aligns you with the broker's long-term interest
Cons (RevShare):
— Slow, variable, and only as good as the broker's retention and honesty
— Negative-carryover clauses can erase your balance when clients win big
Pros (Hybrid):
— Smaller CPA covers ad spend; RevShare tail is upside
— Best risk balance for unproven traffic
Cons (Hybrid):
— Lower CPA than pure-CPA; you trade immediate cash for the tail
The clause that ruins RevShare deals: negative carryover. If a client's profitable months reduce your balance, you can earn nothing for a quarter. Always ask whether carryover resets monthly.
Who should skip RevShare: Affiliates buying expensive paid traffic with no cash buffer — take CPA or hybrid to cover spend.
Verdict: Hybrid hedges unproven traffic.
Spread Bench
@SpreadBench
Forex Deal Types Compared: CPA vs RevShare vs Hybrid
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Spread Bench. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @SpreadBench.