<b>The "non-incent" honor system</b>
Myth: "As long as I don't promise a reward, my traffic counts as non-incent and the dating offer's fine with it."
The chats treat incent as a question of what you said. Advertisers treat it as a question of how the cohort behaves. A dating advertiser doesn't read your creative — they read the curve: time-on-site, message-sent rate, deposit timing, retention at day 7. Reward-driven users cluster — fast reg, zero engagement, no spend — and that fingerprint is detectable whether or not you ever wrote the word "free."
This is why people who buy "clean" pop or some content-locker-adjacent inventory get scrubbed anyway. The source carries incent behavior even when the funnel is innocent. The advertiser caps the sub-id, you assume it's fraud filtering, and you never learn the real signal.
Non-incent isn't a disclosure you make. It's an engagement pattern you either have or don't.
Reality: Advertisers classify incent by behavior, not by your wording, so a 'technically non-incent' source still gets scrubbed if it acts incentivized.
Swipe Myths
@SwipeMyths
<b>The "non-incent" honor system</b>
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Swipe Myths. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @SwipeMyths.