Stack & Compare
Stack & Compare
@StackAndCompare

Myth: "Just use Google Trends instead of paying for volume"

Myth: "Just use Google Trends instead of paying for volume"

Budget advice everywhere. I cross-checked Google Trends against Ahrefs volumes on 25 terms.

Trends is relative, not absolute, it gives you 0-100 interest, never actual searches.

Google Trends:
➕ Free, real-time, brilliant for seasonality and rising-vs-falling
➖ Can't tell you if a term gets 200 or 200,000 searches
➖ Low-volume terms show as a flat zero line, looks dead when it isn't

Ahrefs/Semrush volume:
➕ Absolute numbers to forecast traffic
➖ Paid, estimates not exact

Best for: trend direction and timing, Trends is unbeatable and free. Forecasting traffic or comparing two niches, it literally cannot do that.

Price-vs-value: they're complements, not substitutes. The myth confuses 'free trend signal' with 'free volume data', they're different jobs.

Neutral, no links.

Pick Trends for timing. Skip it for sizing, that's not what it measures.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Stack & Compare. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @StackAndCompare.
tech

Свежие посты в категории «Tech Infrastructure»

Все каналы категории →

start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @AFFtop_connect. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.