Myth: "Just use Google Trends instead of paying for volume"
Budget advice everywhere. I cross-checked Google Trends against Ahrefs volumes on 25 terms.
Trends is relative, not absolute, it gives you 0-100 interest, never actual searches.
Google Trends:
➕ Free, real-time, brilliant for seasonality and rising-vs-falling
➖ Can't tell you if a term gets 200 or 200,000 searches
➖ Low-volume terms show as a flat zero line, looks dead when it isn't
Ahrefs/Semrush volume:
➕ Absolute numbers to forecast traffic
➖ Paid, estimates not exact
Best for: trend direction and timing, Trends is unbeatable and free. Forecasting traffic or comparing two niches, it literally cannot do that.
Price-vs-value: they're complements, not substitutes. The myth confuses 'free trend signal' with 'free volume data', they're different jobs.
Neutral, no links.
Pick Trends for timing. Skip it for sizing, that's not what it measures.
Stack & Compare
@StackAndCompare
Myth: "Just use Google Trends instead of paying for volume"
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Stack & Compare. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @StackAndCompare.