<b>The "Framer vs Webflow" debate is a distraction — they're not even competing for the same job.</b>

<b>The "Framer vs Webflow" debate is a distraction — they're not even competing for the same job.</b>
People argue it like a heavyweight title fight, but Framer wins speed-to-launch and marketing sites you'll redesign yearly, while Webflow wins structured, CMS-heavy sites you'll maintain for years. Asking which is "better" is asking whether a scooter beats a van. The real question nobody starts with: how long does this site need to live, and who maintains it after launch? Answer that and the tool picks itself. The versus framing just sells engagement.
Fight me in the comments.