Stack & Compare
Stack & Compare
@StackAndCompare

Myth: "Free keyword tools give the same volume, just buy later"

Myth: "Free keyword tools give the same volume, just buy later"

People say Keyword Surfer or Google's free volume is close enough to start. I ran 40 keywords through Google Keyword Planner (free) vs Ahrefs and Semrush on a real account.

Keyword Planner:
➕ Free, pulls straight from Google
➖ Buckets volume into ranges (1K-10K), useless for prioritizing
➖ Inflates with close variants lumped together

Ahrefs/Semrush:
➕ Discrete numbers + clickstream-corrected
➖ Paid, and they disagree with each other by 30-50%

Best for: validating a niche exists, free is fine. Picking which of two close terms to target, free will mislead you, those ranges hide the real winner.

Price-vs-value: the myth costs you targeting wrong terms. The bucket problem is the actual trap, not the missing precision.

Affiliate-neutral here, no links.

Pick free if you're idea-stage. Skip it the moment two keywords look 'equal', that's exactly where ranges fail you.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Stack & Compare. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @StackAndCompare.
tech

Свежие посты в категории «Tech Infrastructure»

Все каналы категории →

start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @AFFtop_connect. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.