<b>Velocity and aged placements</b>
Several items this week touched pacing.
—
An agency blog argued the advantage of aged-content inserts is they look natural by definition — the page existed before your link, so there's no obvious campaign footprint.
—
Worth a read: a Reddit thread cautioning that buying 20 inserts in a week from one vendor recreates the footprint you were avoiding.
—
Also circulating: a forum rule of thumb to drip placements and vary vendors rather than batch.
—
Counterpoint: a reply said velocity paranoia is overblown for sites that already publish and earn links steadily.
Editor's note: the natural-footprint benefit of aged content evaporates the moment you batch-buy it.
Pick of the week: drip + vendor variety. The whole point of aged content is to not look like a campaign.
Inserted
@InsertedSEO
<b>Velocity and aged placements</b>
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Inserted. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @InsertedSEO.