If your site is pure marketing, Framer beats Webflow nine times out of ten.

If your site is pure marketing, Framer beats Webflow nine times out of ten.

Webflow wins when you need a real CMS, complex collection lists, and granular control over markup. But most landing pages and small marketing sites never touch that depth. They need fast publishing, clean animations, and a designer who can ship without a class-naming system. Framer does that in an afternoon. Webflow makes you architect a div soup first, then design. You're paying a learning-curve tax for power you'll never use. Pick the tool that matches the job, not the one with the bigger feature list.

Agree? Or are you defending Webflow out of sunk cost?