<b>Myth: a bigger list is always a better asset</b>
The vanity-number worship runs deep in affiliate circles. The curated case this week is that past a point, growth dilutes your sender reputation.
🚀 Deliverability
— <i>The reputation-per-subscriber model</i> — every unengaged address you add lowers your average engagement, the exact metric providers reward. Best framing of the asset question.
🧪 Tests
— <i>The 40% prune that lifted revenue</i> — a sender cut dead weight and saw inbox placement and total clicks rise. Hard numbers, made the cut.
📥 Swipe
— <i>The "quality intake" swipe</i> — co-reg and incentive traps that pad lists with people who'll never open.
Saved you ~2 hours of measuring the wrong number.
—
Доп. контекст по niche edit opportunities — @InsertedSEO
Inbox Loot
@InboxLoot
<b>Myth: a bigger list is always a better asset</b>
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Inbox Loot. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @InboxLoot.