Shorts Stack Tested
Shorts Stack Tested
@ShortsStackTested

<b>Schedulers for Shorts: Metricool vs Buffer vs native</b>

<b>Schedulers for Shorts: Metricool vs Buffer vs native</b>

Scheduling vertical video has gotchas most tools hide.

Metricool ($22/mo):
— Pros: schedules Shorts, Reels, TikTok from one calendar, real analytics
— Cons: Shorts post as drafts on some plans, not auto-publish

Buffer ($6/mo per channel):
— Pros: cheap, clean UI
— Cons: weak video analytics, no Shorts-specific previews

YouTube Studio native (free):
— Pros: true auto-publish, zero cost, full Shorts support
— Cons: no cross-platform, basic calendar

Verdict: if you only do YouTube, native Studio scheduling beats every paid tool for free. Go Metricool only if you cross-post to Reels and TikTok too.

Not for you to pay Buffer for video — it's built for static posts. Pick native, upgrade to Metricool when multi-platform.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Shorts Stack Tested. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @ShortsStackTested.
start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @dumay. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.