Myth: "Their traffic estimate tells you a competitor's real visits"
People quote Ahrefs/Semrush traffic numbers like gospel. I checked both against a site whose real GA I had access to.
Reality: tool estimates were off by 40-300% depending on the site's traffic mix.
Why they diverge:
➕ Both estimate organic from ranking keywords × CTR models
➖ They miss direct, social, email, paid, app, branded entirely
➖ Small or new sites get wildly inaccurate estimates
Semrush:
➕ Separates paid vs organic estimate
➖ Still organic-only as a base
Best for: relative comparison (Site A vs Site B trend), the estimates rank correctly. Absolute 'they get 50K visits', no, that's just organic-keyword math.
Price-vs-value: don't pay extra for 'more accurate traffic', no tool sees a competitor's analytics. The myth treats a model as a meter.
Neutral.
Pick estimates for relative sizing. Skip them as a real-visitor count.
Stack & Compare
@StackAndCompare
Myth: "Their traffic estimate tells you a competitor's real visits"
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Stack & Compare. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @StackAndCompare.