<b>Shorts analytics: native Studio vs paid tools</b>
Knowing why a Short flopped beats making 50 more blind.
YouTube Studio (free):
— Pros: swipe-away rate, retention graph per Short, viewed-vs-swiped — all native and free
— Cons: no cross-Short comparison view, clunky on mobile
VidIQ ($16.58/mo Boost):
— Pros: keyword scoring, outlier detection, competitor tracking
— Cons: Shorts-specific data is thin, mostly built for long-form
Verdict: for Shorts specifically, native Studio's retention and swipe data is more useful than any paid tool — and it's free. VidIQ earns its price only for long-form keyword work.
Not for you to pay for Shorts analytics — the native swipe-away metric is the one that matters and it's free. Pick Studio, skip VidIQ unless you do long-form too.
Shorts Stack Tested
@ShortsStackTested
<b>Shorts analytics: native Studio vs paid tools</b>
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Shorts Stack Tested. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @ShortsStackTested.