Stack Skeptic
Stack Skeptic
@StackSkeptic

<b>MYTH: you'll get paid the same as the vendor's direct sales</b>

<b>MYTH: you'll get paid the same as the vendor's direct sales</b>

Everyone benchmarks their SaaS commissions against the program's headline conversion data. But that data is sales-assisted, and you are not.

Product-led tools convert through onboarding emails, in-app nudges, and a human rep for anything above $99/mo. Your affiliate buyer sees none of that until <i>after</i> the click is attributed — and frequently the rep, not your cookie, closes the deal.

The deeper trap: for higher-tier plans, vendors route prospects to "book a demo," which strips affiliate attribution entirely. You sent a qualified enterprise lead and got credited for the $29 self-serve plan they started on, if anything.

So you're paid on the cheap end of the catalog while the sales team harvests the expensive end you teed up.

Verdict: you fish, they keep the big ones.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Stack Skeptic. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @StackSkeptic.
start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @dumay. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.