Stitch Stack
Stitch Stack
@StitchStack

<b>Hootsuite for Threads: paying enterprise prices for a basic queue</b>

<b>Hootsuite for Threads: paying enterprise prices for a basic queue</b>

Tested on a real account for 9 days because a client insisted.

Pros:
— Threads is a supported network, posts schedule fine
— The unified inbox does pull Threads replies into one stream with your other channels

Cons:
— Starts at $99/mo, and the Threads feature set is no deeper than Buffer's $6 tier
— Analytics for Threads are thin compared to its Instagram/X depth — feels bolted on
— Bulk scheduling is gated behind higher tiers

The annoying limitation: the composer's character counter doesn't account for Threads' 500-char limit correctly when you paste — it warns at X's old count.

The standout (such as it is): the approval workflow and team seats, if you genuinely manage 10+ brands.

Verdict: <b>Skip</b> for Threads specifically. You're paying for legacy enterprise features, not Threads capability.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Stitch Stack. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @StitchStack.
start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @dumay. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.