Lander vs direct-link in the funnel — tracker setup tradeoffs
Send clicks through your own lander or straight to the offer? Beyond conversion theory, the tracker setup differs.
Use a lander (2-hop) when:
— You need pre-sell, pre-qualification, or compliance buffering.
— You want to capture click-through rate as a separate optimization lever.
— You're warming traffic the offer page would reject cold.
Use direct-link (1-hop) when:
— The offer page already converts cold traffic well.
— Every 100ms costs conversions (you remove a full page load).
— The source allows direct offer linking.
Tracker implications to log:
— Lander gives you a CTR metric and a place to fire your own click_id — more control, more failure points.
— Direct-link means your tracker only sees the click and the postback — no mid-funnel signal.
— With a lander, ensure the click_id passes lander → offer or you lose attribution at hop two.
Rule: direct-link to validate an offer fast, add a lander once you need a CTR lever or a compliance buffer.
Save this SOP. Run this before every launch.
Tracker Playbook
@TrackerPlaybook
Lander vs direct-link in the funnel — tracker setup tradeoffs
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Tracker Playbook. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @TrackerPlaybook.