Algo Whisperer
Algo Whisperer
@AlgoWhispererX

Heard: native analytics vs third-party — they measure different reach

Heard: native analytics vs third-party — they measure different reach
Confirmed: X's native analytics counts impressions including the 'For You' algorithmic surface; many third-party tools historically estimate from follower reach only.
Rumored: as of recent API changes, some external dashboards under-report impressions by 20-40% because they lost access to the full impression field.
Which to trust for what:
— Native: source of truth for impressions, profile clicks, the engagement-to-impression ratio
— Third-party (Blackmagic, etc.): better for trend lines, posting-time heatmaps, follower cohort analysis
What it means for your reach: report from native, optimize patterns with the external tool. Don't make decisions on third-party impression counts.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Algo Whisperer. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @AlgoWhispererX.
traffic

Свежие посты в категории «Traffic Sources»

Все каналы категории →

start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @AFFtop_connect. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.