Google Workspace vs Microsoft 365 for cold sending
The mailbox provider you buy decides half your deliverability before you write a word.
Google Workspace Pros:
— More forgiving spam filters toward other Gmail inboxes
— Easier API for warm-up tools to authenticate
— SPF/DKIM/DMARC setup is well-documented
Google Cons:
— Aggressive on bulk patterns; suspends fast
— ~$6/mailbox before discounts
Microsoft 365 Pros:
— Cheaper at scale via reseller plans
— Lands well in other Outlook/corporate inboxes
— Tolerates slightly higher per-mailbox volume
Microsoft Cons:
— Notorious for silent throttling and IP reputation drama
— OAuth setup for sequencers is fiddly
Verdict: Google 4/5 for B2C-flavored lists, Microsoft 4/5 when your targets are enterprise.
Who it's for: Match the mailbox to the recipient. Selling to startups on Gmail? Google. Selling to corporates on Outlook? Microsoft. Mixing both with separate sending pools beats forcing one provider everywhere.
Cold Open
@ColdOpenSEO
Google Workspace vs Microsoft 365 for cold sending
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Cold Open. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @ColdOpenSEO.