AdSense Auto Ads vs manual placements: convenience vs control
Benchmark drop. Session RPM, identical traffic, A/B split (n=65 sites):
— Auto Ads (Google places) $▮▮▮▮▮ 8.40
— Manual fixed slots $▮▮▮▮▮▮ 9.90
— Auto Ads + manual anchors locked $▮▮▮▮▮▮▮ 10.60
Auto Ads optimize density with Google's model but routinely over-insert, hurting Core Web Vitals and user trust. Manual gives control but you leave density-tuning on the table.
The winner is hybrid: lock your high-value anchor and in-content slots manually, let Auto Ads fill the gaps with a density cap. Cap auto-density at 'Medium', never 'Maximum'.
So what: Hybrid vs pure Auto Ads — session RPM ▲ 26%, CLS ▼.
RPM Receipts
@RPMReceipts
AdSense Auto Ads vs manual placements: convenience vs control
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале RPM Receipts. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @RPMReceipts.