Shorts Stack Tested
Shorts Stack Tested
@ShortsStackTested

<b>Submagic vs Captions: the AI-caption duel</b>

<b>Submagic vs Captions: the AI-caption duel</b>

Two apps built only for short-form captions and b-roll.

Submagic ($16/mo, 30 videos):
— Pros: auto emoji + zoom + b-roll insertion, fast batch export, good for talking-head Shorts
— Cons: emoji spam looks templated, gets repetitive across a channel

Captions ($24.99/mo desktop):
— Pros: AI Eye Contact and Dub features are genuinely strong, polished UI
— Cons: pricier, mobile and desktop plans billed separately, watermark on free

Verdict: Submagic if you pump volume and want hands-off styling; Captions if eye-contact correction and dubbing matter more than caption flair.

Not for you if you want full manual control over kerning — both auto-style aggressively. Pick Submagic for cost, Captions for the AI gimmicks that actually work.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Shorts Stack Tested. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @ShortsStackTested.
start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @dumay. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.