Builder Bench
Builder Bench
@BuilderBench

<b>Bricks 1.9 vs Elementor 3.x: the DOM depth tax</b>

<b>Bricks 1.9 vs Elementor 3.x: the DOM depth tax</b>
Same three-column hero, two builders, very different output. I rebuilt one landing page in both and counted nodes.

— Elementor wraps every column in section &gt; container &gt; column &gt; widget-wrap &gt; widget. That hero shipped 38 div nodes.
— Bricks output the same layout in 11 nodes, no forced wrappers, semantic tags you pick yourself.

<b>Pros (Bricks):</b> lean markup, flat DOM, faster style recalc on long pages.
<b>Cons (Bricks):</b> you hand-build structure, fewer guardrails, steeper first week.
<b>Pros (Elementor):</b> the nesting just works, huge template pool.
<b>Cons (Elementor):</b> div soup inflates CLS risk and CSS specificity wars.

<b>Best for:</b> Bricks if you read your own HTML; Elementor if speed-to-first-draft beats page weight.
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Builder Bench. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @BuilderBench.
start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @dumay. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.