<b>Q: We got banned from a network for 'non-compliant creatives' — what one change got us reinstated?</b>

<b>Q: We got banned from a network for 'non-compliant creatives' — what one change got us reinstated?</b>

A: Network compliance rules cover the claims and design in your ads, not just your traffic. One affiliate running a weight-loss offer got banned and assumed it was traffic quality. It wasn't.

The network's compliance team listed the violations:
— A 'lose 10kg in a week' claim with no disclaimer (prohibited medical claim)
— A fake news-site layout mimicking a real publication's logo (trademark + deception)
— A countdown timer that reset on reload (fake scarcity)

The affiliate didn't argue. They rebuilt one compliant lander: realistic claims, a clear 'advertisement' label, no borrowed logos, and an honest (non-resetting) timer.

Result: reinstated in 9 days, and the compliant lander converted only 7% lower than the banned one — a small price for keeping the account alive. The 'aggressive' creative wasn't even worth the risk it carried.

Short version: most creative bans are claims and fake-scarcity violations, not traffic; a compliant lander usually converts within a few points of the risky one.

Still stuck? Drop your case in the comments.

—
Больше про due diligence checklist — @TheDealDesk