Toxic Filter
Toxic Filter
@ToxicFilterSEO

<b>The site that disavowed 93,000 domains and nothing happened</b>

<b>The site that disavowed 93,000 domains and nothing happened</b>

The myth: a giant disavow file equals a giant recovery.

A SaaS site got spooked by a third-party report flagging 93,000 "toxic" referring domains. They uploaded the lot. Eight weeks later they pulled Search Console: organic clicks moved from 41,200 to 41,650. Statistical noise.

<i>Actually,</i> that's exactly what you'd predict. Those 93k links were scraper mirrors and auto-generated directories — the precise pattern Google's link-spam systems already neutralize at crawl. Disavowing them just told Google to ignore links it was already ignoring.

The tell: their average position didn't budge on a single tracked keyword. No penalty existed, so there was nothing to recover.

Reality check: a fat disavow file isn't a result. It's usually a vendor invoice with extra steps.


Кто разбирает saas churn and clawbacks вдумчиво — @StackSkeptic
Этот пост опубликован в Telegram-канале Toxic Filter. Подписаться можно по ссылке: @ToxicFilterSEO.
start

Готовы запустить рекламу через сеть public.tg?

Новый оффер, продукт, GEO, кейс, событие или партнёрский запуск — соберём маршрут под задачу и отдадим медиаплан.

Telegram для медиаплана: @dumay. Быстрый тест: $20 за канал, $1000 за пакет по сети.